EMPIRICAL RESEARCH OF ASPECTS OF PERSONAL HAPPINESS IN PRE-WAR TIMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psyspu/2023.1.5Keywords:
happiness, factors of happiness, gender aspect of experiencing happiness, age aspect of experiencing happiness, needs, social groupsAbstract
The article highlights the main approaches to understanding the essence of the concept of “happiness”: the hedonistic approach, the eudaimonic approach, and the study of happiness as a positive affective state. The definition of happiness has been presented as a psychological phenomenon that is characterized by satisfaction and awareness of human life activities, the dominance of a positive emotional state, a holistic perception of time, a positive attitude towards oneself and the surrounding world. The concept of “mature happiness” has been highlighted as a positive state of mind characterized by peace, acceptance, satisfaction, and inner harmony. The structural aspects of happiness have been defined: subjectivity; absence of negative affect and a certain expression of positive states; having a global assessment of one’s life. The article deals with the problem of socio-psychological factors of person’s experiencing happiness. The dependence of the level of happiness on age, gender and belonging to a certain professional group has been shown. It has been stated that the life satisfaction index decreases with age. It has been established that in middle adulthood there are more people who have a level of satisfaction with life “below the average”. It has been found that health, family and love are the most important criteria for happiness. Gender aspects of experiencing happiness have been considered. It has been confirmed that for women the most important are security needs and interpersonal needs, for men – satisfaction of the need for recognition, self-expression and material needs. It has been determined that psychologists are the most satisfied with life among various professional groups (it is connected with the available professional psychological knowledge); teachers are the least satisfied. The research has established the existence of direct correlations between the feeling of happiness and the level of personal motivation for success and the degree of satisfaction of basic needs.
References
Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. / In J.P. Forgas & J.M. Innes (Eds.). Recent Advances in Social Psychology: An International Perspective. P. 189–203. North-Holland: Elsevier.
Vera, P., Celis, K., Pavez, P., Lillo, S., Bello, F., Díaz, F., et al. (2012). Money, age and happiness: association of subjective well-being with socio-demographic variables. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 44(2), 155–163.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist. 55, 34–43.
Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018066.
Dambrun, M., & Ricard, M. (2011). Self-centeredness and selflessness: a theory of self-based psychological functioning and its consequences for happiness. Review of General Psychology. 15(2), 138–157.
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K.M., and Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: the architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology. Vol. 9(2), 111–131.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology / ed. S. Fiske (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.), 52:141–166.
Seligman, M.E.P., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: an introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.
Steger, M.F., Kashdan, T.B., and Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: eudaimonic activity and daily wellbeing correlates, mediators, and temporal relations. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 22–42. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.03.004.
Wong, P.T.P., & Bowers, V. (2018). Mature happiness and global well-being in difficult times, in Scientific Concepts Behind Happiness, Kindness, and Empathy in Contemporary Society (Hershey, PA: IGI Global), 112–134. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5918-4.ch006.
Dissanayake, M., Kamble, S. & Patil, A. (2018). Predicting happiness and life satisfaction from individuals’ perceptions of life. Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Arts and Humanities. Vol. 4. Issue 2. 2017, pp. 21–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17501/icoah.2017.4203.
happiness and a proposal for a national index. Ameri-Kahneman, D. (1999). “Objective happiness,” in Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, eds D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation), 3–25.
Huebner, E.S., Funk, B.A., & Gilman, R. (2000). Cross-sectional and longitudinal psychosocial correlates of adolescent life satisfaction reports. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 53–64.
Lewis, C.A., McCollum, M.A., & Joseph, S. (1999). The Depression-Happiness Scale: Test-retest data over two weeks. Psychological Reports, 85, 889–892.
