LINGUISTIC ASPECT OF INTERCULTURAL CONFLICT COMMUNICATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/philspu/2023.4.4

Keywords:

communicative conflict, English language, intercultural communicative competence, intercultural conflict communication, interlingual homonym, linguistic aspect, Ukrainian language.

Abstract

The article reveals the linguistic aspect of intercultural conflict communication with the help of a specially prepared linguistic experiment on “Interlingual homonyms” (conducted with English- and Ukrainian-speaking students of Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University), as well as through scientific observation (interesting conflict-generating communication situations during the educational process, the subject of which was the contradictory use of certain morphological forms and phraseological units, were identified). Intercultural communication is positioned as a process of verbal and non-verbal communication between people belonging to different national and cultural communities. Conflict in intercultural communication (i.e., intercultural conflict communication) is presented as a cultural phenomenon, the content of which is determined by cultural factors, and the process of emergence and development of conflicts is regulated by cultural norms, which under certain circumstances lead to the emergence of special cultural rituals that affect the process of conflict interaction between participants. The analysis of the linguistic aspect of intercultural conflict communication is to identify verbal and non-verbal markers of cultural information in order to achieve communicative interaction between representatives of different cultures and prevent the emergence of communicative conflicts. Specific examples demonstrate that intercultural conflict communication can be realized at several linguistic levels: lexical, phraseological, morphological, and syntactic. It is proved that the most effective way to regulate intercultural conflict communication is to develop intercultural communication competence in its real and potential participants as the ability to adequately use culturally significant language tools, concepts and behavioral stereotypes.

References

Білоконенко Л.А. Українськомовна репрезентація міжособистісного конфлікту: автореф. дис. … докт. філол. наук: 10.02.01. Київ, 2017. 39 с.

Casmir F.L. Interkulturelle Kommunikation als Prozess. Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Munchen; Basel, 1998. S. 15–26.

Гарькавець С.О. Соціальні конфлікти. Сєвєродонецьк, 2020. 120 с.

Селіванова О. Нариси з української фразеології (психокогнітивний та етнокультурний аспекти). Київ; Черкаси, 2004. 276 с.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

Issue

Section

SECTION 1 LINGUISTICS