NATIONAL SOURCES OF FORMATION IN THE UKRAINIAN TERMINOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the analysis of national resources for the formation of the Ukrainian terminology of management. It has been established that the specific means of formation are the use of existing models in the Ukrainian language: secondary nomination,morphological, and analytical methods.Secondary nomination is based on one of the lexical-semantic means – metaphor or metonymy. It has been found that metaphorizationcan occur not only on the basis of commonly used vocabulary but also on the basis of changes in the meanings of terms borrowed fromother terminological systems. Metaphor terms related to color symbolism are identified. Examples of management terms formed bytransferring meaning based on metonymy are given.It has been proven that the important source of enrichment of Ukrainian specialized language of management is the morphological way of formation: the most widely represented suffix formation, a small number of terms formed by the prefixal method, composition, juxtaposition, abbreviation, as in the morphological structure of terms formed by affixation, word and root formation, the foundationsof structural systematization of terms have been laid. The peculiar feature of the studied terminology system is the existence in specialized literature of abbreviations-anglicisms written mainly in Latin script.Analytical derivation is analyzed as a productive way of enriching the metalanguage of management. Compound terms convey belonging to a classification series based on hyper-hyponymic comparison of concepts. The most typical structural models, according to which complex terms are formed, have been identified. Terms with a participle component have been confirmed. It has been concludedthat two-three-component term-phrases are the most characteristic for the management terminology system.