DARK’ MATTERS IN FRAMING AXIOLOGICAL PATTERNS: FROM PIE TO OLD ENGLISH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/philspu/2026.13.3

Keywords:

axiology, vertical axiological hierarchy, homiletic prose, Old English, lexeme “dark”, semantic convergence

Abstract

This article offers an axiological and etymological investigation of the conceptualization of “dark” in Old English literary monuments. This study argues that the concept serves as a fundamental, life-defining pillar of Old English worldview, rooted in Proto- Indo-European (PIE) etymons. The analysis is grounded in three primary PIE roots: *regwos- (darkness as a spatial location), *temh- (darkness as a state of stasis or petrification), and *dher- (darkness as qualitative impurity). These roots provide the semantic framework for the subsequent analysis of heroic, elegiac, and homiletic texts. In the heroic epic Beowulf, darkness is analyzed as a tangible, monstrous threat where, the “dark” frame is synonymous with active malice and social disintegration, embodied by the sceadugenga (shadow-stalker) who encroaches upon the sunlit hall. The study then examines the internalization of darkness in The Battle of Maldon and The Seafarer. In these works, the “dark” frame is manifested through hostile terrain and visual darkness where environmental suffering becomes a precursor to spiritual trial. The final stage of the study focuses on the homilies of Ælfric of Eynsham. The author reveals a radical reshaping of the axiological axis: from a horizontal heroic frontier to a strict Christian verticality. Ælfric’s texts display a lexical asymmetry – where “light” lexemes dominate while “dark” ones are fragmented into notions of paganism, sorcery, and the demonic – fully moralizing the qualitative “impurity” of the PIE root *dher-. The article concludes that in the homiletic tradition, darkness is no longer merely an environmental condition but an internal state of ontological degradation. The study proves that the “dark” frame, though lexically sporadic in some contexts, remains the silent axis upon which the transition from heroic to Christian morality was constructed

References

Mallory J. P., Adams D. Q. Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997. 829 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/EncyclopediaOfIndoEuropeanCulture (дата звернення: 09.02.2026).

Mallory J. P., Adams D. Q. The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2006. 731 p.

Orel V. A handbook of Germanic etymology. Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2003. 682 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/Orel-AHandbookOfGermanicEtymology (дата звернення: 21.04.2026).

Bosworth J., Toller T. N. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online / ed. by T. Northcote Toller, enlarged by A. Campbell. Prague : Faculty of Arts, Charles University, 2014. URL: https://bosworthtoller.com/ (дата звернення: 21.04.2026).

Beowulf / ed. and trans. by R. M. Liuzza. 2nd ed. Broadview Press, 2012. 320 p.

The Battle of Maldon. Anglo-Saxon Archaeology and History in Europe. URL: http://anglo-saxon.archeurope.com/literature/battle-of-maldon-o-e-text/ (дата звернення: 09.02.2026).

The Seafarer. Hwaet! Old English in Context. URL: http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=get&type=text&id=Sfr(дата звернення: 09.02.2026).

Ælfric of Eynsham. Lives of Saints / ed. by W. W. Skeat. London : Early English Text Society ; Oxford University Press, 1881–1900. URL: https://projetocaedmon.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/aelfric-life-of-the-saints-deauguriis.pdf (дата звернення: 09.02.2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25