MODERN EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING IN INDIVIDUALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psyspu/2025.2.8Keywords:
critical thinking, personality, educational practices, problem-based learning, metacognition, parallel thinking method, digital content critiqueAbstract
The article is devoted to the systematization of modern educational practices for developing critical thinking among learners. The work provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the main methods for cultivating critical thinking that are applied within educational environments. In particular, it examines methods of parallel thinking, problem-based learning, metacognition, and digital content critique. The authors conceptualize critical thinking as a mental process of independent inquiry and the discovery of fundamentally new insights – that is, a process of mediation and generalization in the reflection of reality during its analysis and synthesis, which arises on the basis of practical activity and experience. In the course of the research, the effectiveness of various methods for developing critical thinking was analyzed in terms of their didactic feasibility, practical implementation mechanisms, and learning outcomes. It has been demonstrated that problem-based learning enhances the ability to formulate questions and seek well-reasoned solutions, metacognition enables awareness of one’s own thought processes, the method of parallel thinking develops the ability to generate multiple possible options or ideas for problem-solving and digital content critique fosters media literacy and the ability to distinguish reliable information from fake or manipulative content. An analysis of scientific and empirical studies confirmed that the use of the STEAM approach, simulations and role-playing games, as well as the integration of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, significantly increases the effectiveness of developing learners critical thinking skills. Moreover, the incorporation of modern technologies into the educational process motivates learners to engage actively, promotes independent decision-making, meaningful analysis, information comparison, and enhances their ability to evaluate alternatives and identify optimal solutions to problems. The synthesis of research results indicates that the development of critical thinking requires a comprehensive approach combining interactive methods, technological flexibility, and continuous monitoring of effectiveness.
References
Akram A., Nawaz M., Sattar S., Tasawar A., Ajmal S., & Ur Rahman A. Development of critical thinking in psychology: The role of cognitive processes in problem-solving, decision making, and decision manufacturing. Research Journal of Psychology, 2020. 2. Рр. 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1234/rjp.2020.021244
Binkley M., Erstad O., Herman J., Raizen S., Ripley M., Miller-Ricci M., Rumble M. Defining twenty-first century skills. In: Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer, 2012. Р. 17–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Brookfield S. D. Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. Jossey-Bass, 2012. Р. 31–78.
Brookfield S. D. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass, 2017. Р. 102–149.
De Bono E. Six thinking hats. Little, Brown and Company, 1999. Р. 22–65.
De Bono E. Six frames for thinking about information. HarperCollins, 2000. Р. 33–74.
Dwyer C. P., Hogan M. J., Stewart I. An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2014. Т. 12. Р. 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Elder L., Paul R. Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. FT Press, 2013. Р. 22–63.
Ennis R. H. The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University
of Illinois, 2011. Р. 5–18.
Facione N. C., Facione P. A. Critical thinking and clinical reasoning in the health sciences. Insight Assessment, 2008. Р. 3–25. https://insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia-critical-thinking-and-clinical-reasoning.pdf
Facione P. A. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). ERIC ED315423, 1990. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315423.pdf
Fisher A. Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2011. Р. 11–55.
García A., Seglem R., Share J. Transforming teaching and learning through media literacy education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 2019. Т. 62, № 6. Р. 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.912
Halpern D. F. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press, 2014. Р. 49–102.
Jaramillo Gómez D. L., Álvarez Maestre A. J., Parada Trujillo A. E., Pérez Fuentes C. A., Bedoya Ortiz D. H., & Sanabria Alarcón R. K. Determining factors for the development of critical thinking in higher education. Journal of Intelligence,
13(6). 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060059
Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. Р. 79–146.
Kuhn D. A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher. 1999. Т. 28, № 2. Р. 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002016
Lai E. R. Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson Research Report, 2011. Р. 1–40. https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf
Lipman M. Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Р. 45–79.
McPeck J. E. Critical thinking and education. Routledge, 2016. Р. 39–81.
OECD. The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing, 2018. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Paul R., & Elder L. Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (4-е вид.). Pearson, 2020. Р. 400.
Seemiller C., Grace M. Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass, 2016. Р. 112–145.
UNESCO. Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing, 2021. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707







