METAPHORIZATION OF THE COUNTRY CONCEPT IN THE INTERNET DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/philspu/2023.3.17Keywords:
country, concept, conceptual metaphor, order metaphorization parameters, Internet discourse, corpusAbstract
The article represents the metaphorization mechanism of the COUNTRY concept in the Internet discourse as the medium of the liveliest and most changeable communication. The authors conduct their research via the classical methodology of conceptual metaphor by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson in combination with the metaphorization order parameters by N.V. Tatsenko (the spatial, dimensional, discrete, possessive, artifact, perceptive, personifying ones, etc.). As the authentic research material, the authors use the Corpus of Contemporary American English. Via random sampling, a set of 100 contexts with the word “country” is selected, which is the name of the COUNTRY concept itself. The choice of this American corpus is explained by two facts. Firstly, the English language is the main means of international communication. Therefore, it is the American Internet discourse that represents the broadest concept consideration by the social community. Secondly, the Corpus of Contemporary American English updates annually with the latest authentic examples of the COUNTRY metaphorization as a socially significant concept. The sample contexts are processed to define metaphors of the COUNTRY concept within the semantically valent collocations. From the perspective of the order metaphorization parameters by N.V. Tatsenko, the concept is considered via metaphors COUNTRY is PLACE; THING; COMPLEX, FRAGMENTED or LEVELED OBJECT; MECHANISM; PHYSICAL BODY; SHIP; LIVING ORGANISM; ANALYZING OBJECT; OWNER; PROPERTY; GOODS; RESOURCE; PROTECTING OBJECT; PRODUCT; GAME. The most frequent realization proved to be the metaphor COUNTRY is LIVING ORGANISM. The simultaneous overlaying of several metaphorization parameters makes a multidirectional COUNTRY association with a human. That underlines its vitality and social nature. Regardless of the first-ever attempt to study the COUNTRY concept in this aspect, we are going to research the same concept via broader samples in future (to clarify the results). Besides, we can study the COUNTRY metaphorization in other discourses or languages.
References
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981. 256 p. URL: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo3637992.html.
Kövecses Z. Metaphor, cognition, culture. Handbook of Advances in Culture and Psychology. 2018. Volume 7. P. 61–106. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190879228.003.0002.
Stanojević M. Metaphor at the intersection of concepts, language and discourse. Jezikoslovlje. 2020. Volume 21. Issue 2. P. 149–178. URL: https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2020.6.
Bilyk O., Pyliachyk N. Metaphorization of BREXIT in modern political discourse. Advanced Education. 2018. Issue 10. P. 118–126. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.127267.
Janodet F.L. Conceptual metaphor in Eurosceptic political discourse (French-Spanish). Logos: Revista de Linguistica, Filosofia y Literatura. 2020. Volume 30. Issue 2. P. 349–364. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.15443/RL3026.
Stojan N. et al. Conceptual metaphors in political discourse in Croatian, American and Italian newspapers. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2019. Volume 8. Issue 1. P. 69–76. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2019-0007.
Kapranov O. Conceptual metaphors in Ukrainian prime ministers’ discourse involving renewables. Topics in Linguistics. 2015. Volume 16. Issue 1. P. 4–16. URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2015-0007.
Kavilanan S. et al. Metaphor in the stock exchange business discourse. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 2018. Volume 39. Issue 3. P. 840–849. URL: https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/242611.
da Silva A.S. From economic crisis to austerity policies through conceptual metaphor: A corpus-based comparison of metaphors of crisis and austerity in the Portuguese press. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. 2020. Volume 87. P. 51–86. URL: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.87.02soa.
Bogdanović M. Conceptual metaphors in economic discourse of Serbian and British newspaper articles. Palimpsest. 2023. Volume 8. Issue 15. P. 27–37. URL: https://doi.org/10.46763/PALIM23815027b.
Sporiş V. Conceptual metaphor in TV journalism: BREXIT phenomenon. Revista Transilvania. 2016. Issue 11. P. 90–96. URL: https://revistatransilvania.ro/metafora-conceptuala-in-jurnalismul-de-televiziune-fenomenulbrexit.
Lahlou H., Rahim H.A. Conceptual metaphors in North African French-speaking news discourse about COVID-19. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2016. Volume 11. Issue 3. P. 589–600. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.35949.
Navarro i Ferrando I. Conceptual metaphor types in oncology: Cognitive and communicative functions. Ibérica. 2017. Issue 34. P. 163–186. URL: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2870/287053467008.pdf.
Climent S., Coll-Florit M. Conceptual metaphor in psychiatric discourse on schizophrenia. Ibérica. 2017. Issue 34. P. 187–208.
Maumevičienė D. Lithuanisation of software metaphors. Studies about Languages. 2022. Issue 40. P. 103–114. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.40.1.31081.
Kravets L. et al. Cognitive (conceptual) metaphor in the Ukrainian poetic discourse. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2021. Volume 17. P. 1308– 1319. URL: https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/2601.
Shevchenko I., Shastalo V. The conceptual metaphor of modesty in English and Ukrainian. Cognitive Studies. 2021. Issue 21. 2462. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11649/cs.2462.
Bystrov Y., Tatsakovych U. Metaphorical conceptualization of beauty in Donna Tartt’s “The Secret History”: Translation perspectives. Neohelicon. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-023-00697-7.
Єгорова О.І., Рогоза І.К. Метафорична концептуалізація МАЙДАНУ (на матеріалі німецькомовних інтернет-ЗМІ). Наукові записки НДУ імені М. Гоголя. Серія «Філологічні науки». 2015. Книга 3. С. 98–102. URL: http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/44410.
Степанов В.В. Образний компонент концепту СТІЙКІСТЬ: корпусне дослідження американського дискурсу. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія «Філологія». 2022. Випуск 56. С. 135–140. URL: https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2022.56.30.
Степанов В.В., Носова А.С. Метафоризація концепту УКРАЇНА в сучасному американському публіцистичному дискурсі. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія «Філологія». 2022. Випуск 57. С. 87–92. URL: https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2022.57.21.
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). URL: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca.
Таценко Н.В. Емпатія в сучасному англомовному дискурсі: когнітивно-синергетичний вимір : дис. … доктора філол. наук : 10.02.04. ХНУ імені В.Н. Каразіна, 2018. 460 с.