ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL APPROACHES TO ORGANIZING SPORTS ACTIVITIES FOR WAR VETERANS IN INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/olimpspu/2026.1.11

Keywords:

sport, socialization, rehabilitation, persons with disabilities, quality of life, systemic support model, social integration, international cooperation

Abstract

Many experts emphasize the importance of sport as a powerful tool for socialization, integration, and rehabilitation of persons with disabilities and combat veterans. International experience demonstrates the effectiveness of sport as a means of physical and psychological recovery, enhancing self-esteem and quality of life. Purpose: to summarize the organizational and legal foundations of international practice in organizing sports activities for war veterans and to identify directions for their adaptation to Ukrainian realities. The study employed a set of methods: theoretical analysis and synthesis of scientific and methodological literature, documentary method, induction and deduction, analogy, abstraction and concretization, as well as comparison. In Ukraine, sports for war veterans began to actively develop only after 2014, while the full-scale invasion of 2022 led to a sharp increase in the number of persons with disabilities, highlighting the need to create a systemic model of support and social integration through sport. International cooperation plays an important role, ensuring the exchange of experience, organization of joint programs, and development of innovative approaches to sports rehabilitation. The general trend is a transition from narrow rehabilitative impact to comprehensive support for veterans, where sport is viewed as a tool of social integration, professional realization, and long-term support. The use of modern technologies, such as VR, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence, opens new perspectives for personalized rehabilitation programs. The study emphasizes the relevance of harmonizing Ukraine’s regulatory framework with European standards and the necessity of creating a holistic system for organizing sports activities for war veterans, which will contribute to their rehabilitation, social adaptation, and integration into society. The models are characterized as follows: the USA and the UK have the most developed systems, combining state funding and charitable initiatives, integrating sport into healthcare and social support systems; Germany and the Netherlands implement inclusive models, where veterans are integrated into the general system of adaptive sports; Canada and Australia offer comprehensive programs that take into account the needs of veterans’ families and employment opportunities in the sports sector; France applies a centralized model, integrating veterans into the general system of adaptive sports without creating separate programs.

References

Жарська Н., Будзин В. Фізкультурно-спортивна реабілітація у сфері фізичної культури та спорту. Економіко-соціальні відносини в галузі фізичної культури та сфері обслуговування : тези доп. V Міжнар. наук.– практ. конф. / за заг. ред. Н. Павленчик. Львів : ЛДУФК імені Івана Боберського, 2023. C. 204–206.

Український центр з фізичної культури і спорту осіб з інвалідністю : Офіційний веб-сайт. URL: http://www.invasport.org.ua/ (дата звернення: 28.10.2025).

Anderson D. Social capital and quality of life in persons with mobility impairments through adaptive sport participation. Sport in Society. 2017. Vol. 20, № 9. P. 1369–1388.

Deaflympics : Official website. URL: https://www.deaflympics.com/ (accessed: 05.11.2025).

Hums M. A., Moorman A. M., Wolff E. A. The inclusion of the Paralympics in the Olympic and Amateur Sports Act: Legal and policy implications for integration of athletes with disabilities into the United States Olympic Committee. Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 2003. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 261–275.

IPC Athlete Classification Code. International Paralympic Committee. 2015. URL: https://www.paralympic.org/classification-code (accessed: 08.11.2025).

Jeong Y., Block M., Sterling M. Promoting inclusion through unified sports: The Special Olympics experience. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2018. Vol. 89, № 2. P. 9–13.

Legg D., Steadward R. The Paralympic Games and 60 years of change (1948-2008): Unification and restructuring from a disability and medical to a sport-based philosophy. Sport in Society. 2011. Vol. 14, № 9. P. 1099–1115.

Military Sports Rehabilitation Programs: International Perspectives. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Brussels, 2020. 156 p.

Misener L., Darcy S., Legg D., Gilbert K. Beyond Olympic legacy: Understanding Paralympic legacy through a thematic synthesis. Journal of Sport Management. 2013. Vol. 27, № 4. P. 329–341.

United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. URL: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/ (accessed: 18.11.2025).

Vanlandewijck Y. C., Thompson W. R. The Paralympic Athlete: Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. 368 p.

Published

2026-05-12